Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Policy Proposal (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
-
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@localhost
-
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:16:17 -0700
-
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nowsp; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1193685209; x=1194290009; i=jordi.palet@localhost q=dns; h=DomainKey-Signature:Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To: Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To:Mime-version: Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; b=hLTE1TRqTXmUsb T8QbvqPpsHO4s1YyOIrGp94SFzFKxgrIodNmvPDAunK8yaiiRlFX5Tbvt8v52TMs AyIG6uU/VZFS+Cd7B6UxrKW3vmpVZKoj/xE5u7eLG7PYEpd18gfIy6gQDm7L3uMZ 0Z98LnQQy0YpimOENQ2jhb8rJtJVI=
-
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=OEQtdrO/3PDmr87PhPNUwYbhSHQj25mGL8W8lv3CTv4GIi9qDpl5ZRLQtXlf3DitV9nLX96jzdyBdEa6UCC6hsLl67qP+IeK/hlJBWarvu/jGORFbUUgfjyjoexGS/SkOeg1GTIDi3GFhmfEcFcGkp88WAiImWtgTIwwZq3EQOs=;
-
Reply-to: jordi.palet@localhost
Hi Mat,
I guess it will be clear when the audio/video is available. I explained in
my presentation that this is our own network.
We have several services which are dual-stack, but my view is that most of
the traffic is peer to peer traffic that is being "attracted" to our network
because we offer an open public 6to4 and Teredo relay, in addition to the
tunnel broker.
This may sound as a biased measurement, but actually I don't think so. If we
don't have those relays running, this peer-to-peer traffic will be going
thru other relays, right ? So unless there is no any relay ... it means that
it is logic to assume that the global traffic may become close to those
figures, and I guess this will be more true in the next few months, as more
and more folks use Vista (and other IPv6 enabled OSs) which automatically
use transition mechanisms, and as much more applications take advantage of
that.
My intend to confirm this, is to decide how to distribute this measurement
tool to several ISPs in each region, and then have a regional and global
picture of what is actually happening, in such way that we can extrapolate
overall IPv6 traffic. As we are measuring transition and I don't expect that
the native one will grow too much unless many ISPs start offering dual stack
in the access, it is not required that those ISPs being measured have native
support at all. Of course, I don't expect that they will have so much
transition traffic unless they offer also 6to4 and Teredo relays, however my
guess, is that they will be still having more than what they actually
though.
Regards,
Jordi
> De: <matthew.ford@localhost
> Responder a: address-policy-wg-admin@localhost
> Fecha: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:55:39 -0000
> Para: <jordi.palet@localhost
>
> Conversación: [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Policy Proposal (Enabling
> Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
> Asunto: RE: [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Policy Proposal (Enabling Methods
> for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
>
> Hi Jordi,
>
>> Here is my talk in the last meeting plenary with the
>> traffic stats ...
>> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-55/presentation
> s/palet-v6.pdf
>
> Those slides don't mention what network the stats refer to. Care to
> share?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Mat
>
>
**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org
Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
http://www.ipv6day.org
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
|