Re: [address-policy-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg] RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6

[Sander Steffann <s.steffann@localhost]

Hi Michael,

Op 25-okt-2007, om 12:07 heeft <michael.dillon@localhost  
<michael.dillon@localhost het volgende geschreven:
> > 1) Network operators and Internet Service Providers (ISPs)
> > are called to the urgent deployment of IPv6 across their
> > networks as soon as possible. This deployment must include
> > providing IPv6 access to End Users and ensuring services are
> > accessible by IPv6.
> I would like to see this text explicitly mention both "deployment of
> IPv6 network access" and "deployment of IPv6 transitional measures".
> Otherwise, decisionmakers will think that it is sufficient to offer an
> IPv6 version of their IPv4 access product. That is not too hard to do,
> but it doesn't deliver what most customers want, which is access to  
> the
> whole Internet, IPv4 and IPv6. That is where deployment of  
> transitional
> measures become important, and I would argue, that they are more
> important right now than deploying IPv6 access services because the
> transitional measures solve problems that are happening right now with
> native IPv6 in OS/X and Vista.
>
> --Michael Dillon
Thank you for your suggestion. I will include it in the discussion  
later in the iPv6 working group session. It might be too detailed for  
the intended audience though. We are targeting decision makers with  
this text.
Thanks for your input!
Sander