Re: [address-policy-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg] RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6
-
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@localhost, ipv6-wg@localhost
-
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:15:41 +0200
-
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nowsp; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1193310767; x=1193915567; i=jordi.palet@localhost q=dns; h=DomainKey-Signature:Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To: Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To:Mime-version: Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; b=K64qQAzXBB05pm gLaM2kA12AiFo4ut9ZYYgac9OO95GP9vBYMHRTI03hmO6mr/c+KTUhsgZxeX9bAu xaPHfSUldMwxyPetOEwT8dhL/0Xk9eeB4WVz4P8AgWuZTVSs26o1PCUcFOgSL9Oc 26FquVCn3KD1qh6a5HhLYNVVB1dyU=
-
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=HKsDoa+luWAdqHKXGFuDMcKH0L32r6VT6Fk+3X+1Y4FSf+nv5EWYDLcXR1SIlkJ+eJ18TFQ1L7zv9mWdw0nRU+OmJWNo4RqNthuWg3+88TWdPxovIMTvMSqUlIpKNvIcJN6cQ768vFIEd7CDrzwLPTHOchyf687GRjdhpxxgvL4=;
-
Reply-to: jordi.palet@localhost
Fully agree, I actually said it last week in one of my previous emails on
this ... So probably something like:
1) Network operators and Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are called to the
urgent deployment of IPv6 and transitional measures across their networks as
soon as possible. This deployment must include providing IPv6 access to End
Users and ensuring services are accessible by IPv6.
Regards,
Jordi
> De: <michael.dillon@localhost
> Responder a: address-policy-wg-admin@localhost
> Fecha: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:07:40 +0100
> Para: address-policy-wg@localhost, ipv6-wg@localhost
> Conversación: [ipv6-wg] RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and
> Deployment of IPv6
> Asunto: [address-policy-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg] RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4
> Depletion and Deployment of IPv6
>
>
>> 1) Network operators and Internet Service Providers (ISPs)
>> are called to the urgent deployment of IPv6 across their
>> networks as soon as possible. This deployment must include
>> providing IPv6 access to End Users and ensuring services are
>> accessible by IPv6.
>
> I would like to see this text explicitly mention both "deployment of
> IPv6 network access" and "deployment of IPv6 transitional measures".
> Otherwise, decisionmakers will think that it is sufficient to offer an
> IPv6 version of their IPv4 access product. That is not too hard to do,
> but it doesn't deliver what most customers want, which is access to the
> whole Internet, IPv4 and IPv6. That is where deployment of transitional
> measures become important, and I would argue, that they are more
> important right now than deploying IPv6 access services because the
> transitional measures solve problems that are happening right now with
> native IPv6 in OS/X and Vista.
>
> --Michael Dillon
>
**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org
Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
http://www.ipv6day.org
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
|