|
|
 |
RE: [address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
-
To: "'Greg L.'" bgp2@localhost
-
From: Jørgen Hovland jorgen@localhost
-
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:36:59 +0200
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg L. [ ]
>Thanks for your response.
>Who needs a new /24 PI if you are only going to implement DNS anycast in
your own network?
Why do you need anycast DNS?
Suggestions:
* To scale (and keep 100% uptime)
* DDoS prevention/reduction of weaknesses
The scaling problem has already been solved in my previous email.
To take down all of your nameservers, the best way would probably be to generate a lot of DNS queries. But then we are back at the scaling problem which has already been solved. So what is the real problem?
Cheers,
j
|
|
|
|
