Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 August 2007 (IPv6 ULA-Central)

[Roger Jorgensen rogerj@localhost]

On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Gert Doering wrote:
<snip>
> The reason for extending the discussion period is *specifically* to
> see what will happen in the IETF, and then decide how to go ahead with
> this proposal.   If the IETF goes for "yes, ULA-C is a good thing", then
> we can adapt this proposal accordingly - if they go for "ULA-C is not
> going to happen! never ever!" Jordi can withdraw the proposal, and it
> will be history.
The point is that what are being discussed are quite different from what 
the current probposal ( 
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2007-05.html ) says. It is 
probably that both the name, size and usage will probably be different. It 
is in short a quite different scenario.
It will probably also outline a different assignment regime from the 
ULA-block too.

--

------------------------------
Roger Jorgensen              | - ROJO9-RIPE  - RJ85P-NORID
roger@localhost           | - IPv6 is The Key!
-------------------------------------------------------