[address-policy-wg] RE: [afripv6-discuss] Re: [ppml] How to get a IPv6 /32 the cheap way: go to AFRINIC

["Andrew Alston" aa@localhost]

I have to agree with Jeroen on this one...

How does AfriNIC qualify for more than any other organization getting P.I
Space.

If we consider that AfriNIC is *NOT* an LIR (you cant be an LIR *and* an
RIR?) then we have to consider the space provider independent. 

If so, the /32 is a violation of the P.I policy found at
http://www.afrinic.net/docs/policies/afpol-v6200701.htm

To quote the policy point (3):

* The intial provider independent assignment size to an end-site should be a
/48, or a shorter prefix if the end-site can justify it.

As Jeroen says, there needs to be justification.

Just my 2c

Andrew Alston
TENET - Chief Technology Officer



-----Original Message-----
From: afripv6-discuss-bounces@localhost
[
	    
	    
] On Behalf Of JORDI PALET
MARTINEZ
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 4:06 PM
To: ppml@localhost ARIN Address Policy; RIPE Address Policy; IPv6 in Africa
afripv6-discuss@localhost; APNIC IPv6
Subject: [afripv6-discuss] Re: [ppml] How to get a IPv6 /32 the cheap way:
go to AFRINIC

Jeroen,

This is just ridiculous.

All the RIRs have their own /32 for their internal usage.

Regards,
Jordi




> De: Jeroen Massar jeroen@localhost
> Organización: Unfix
> Responder a: ppml-bounces@localhost
> Fecha: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:32:59 +0100
> Para: ARIN Address Policy ppml@localhost, RIPE Address Policy
> address-policy-wg@localhost, AFRNIC IPv6 afripv6-discuss@localhost,
APNIC
> IPv6 global-v6@localhost
> Asunto: [ppml] How to get a IPv6 /32 the cheap way: go to AFRINIC
> 
> [*full rant mode*]
> 
> My eye just fell on a very strange new allocation, apparently made under
some
> new rules in the AFRINIC region which seem to be very wasteful and very
out of
> sync with the rest of the world who are at least thinking a bit about
address
> conservation instead of just blowing address space like there is no
tomorrow:
> 
> http://www.afrinic.net/docs/policies/afpol-v6200407-000.htm#5 details:
> 8<--------------
> 5.1.1. Initial allocation criteria
> To qualify for an initial allocation of IPv6 address space, an
organization
> must:
> a) be an LIR;
> b) not be an end site;
> c) show a detailed plan to provide IPv6 connectivity to organizations in
the
> AfriNIC region.
> d) show a reasonable plan for making /48 IPv6 assignments to end sites in
the
> AfriNIC region within twelve months. The LIR should also plan to announce
the
> allocation as a single aggregated block in the inter-domain routing system
> within twelve months.
> 
> 5.1.2. Initial allocation size
> 
> Organizations that meet the initial allocation criteria are eligible to
> receive a minimum allocation of /32.
> ---------------------------------------------->8
> 
> Wow, so you make a new 'company' in 911 land and say "I am going to
allocate a
> single /48" and you get a FULL /32 even when you will never ever ever use
it
> or even are going to think about using it?
> 
> The first "organization" which is using this to waste space seems to be:
> 
> inet6num:       2001:42d0::/32
> netname:        AfriNIC-IPv6-1
> descr:          AfriNIC
> descr:          RIR
> country:        MU
> 
> Gee, the RIR itself. How many people are using the AFRINIC network? 10-50?
Are
> they really *ever* going to need more than a /48? Are they ever going to
have
> a need for 65536 of those /48's?
> 
> Really this is just a waste of address space. Yes there is "enough", but
being
> sooo obviously wasteful just to be able to have a nice slot in the routing
> tables is a bit over done.
> 
> 
> I hope that the other regions take this in mind too when (re)considering
their
>  address policies.
> 
> Giving out /48's or even a /40 to an organization that is in-effect an
> end-site I can understand, especially when they can justify the need for
that
> amount of address space. But giving /32's to every single endsite that
simply
> asks for it is very very very far fetched. They will not even ever fill up
a
> /40 of address space even if they would have two sites (read: offices) in
> every country in Africa, let alone 65536 sites. Such a waste.
> 
> Funnily later in the above document they point to HD ratios. What point is
> that when the waste is already happened?
> 
> 
> RIR's should be giving out address space based on "need" and that need
must
> justified, giving out /32's as "those fit in the routing slots" is a
really
> really bad idea.
> 
> In short: if you want a nice /32 without issues: setup a small shop in
Africa
> and presto!
> 
> Greets,
>  Jeroen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This message sent to you through the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List
> (PPML@localhost).
> Manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml




**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org

Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
http://www.ipv6day.org

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the
individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information, including attached files, is prohibited.




_______________________________________________
afripv6-discuss mailing list
afripv6-discuss@localhost
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/afripv6-discuss