RE: [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
-
To: "'Lutz Donnerhacke'" lutz@localhost, address-policy-wg@localhost
-
From: Jørgen Hovland jorgen@localhost
-
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 11:02:05 +0200
Hi Lutz,
Which RIR is that? According to RIPEs IPv6 policy, the minimum PA block is /32 so I was kinda wondering. I need a /96. I can even manage with a /112. (Please let's not start a useless discussion of why you think I need it).
Cheers,
J
-----Original Message-----
From: address-policy-wg-admin@localhost [ ] On Behalf Of Lutz Donnerhacke
Sent: 29. mai 2007 15:22
Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
* Jørgen Hovland wrote:
> Q: Is it correct that you can get a /26 IPv4 PA block, but you can't get
> a /96 IPv6 PA block? Why is that?
It's not correct. /48, /56, /64, and /112 are the most common assigments here.
|
you are here: RIPE -> RIPE Maillists > Archives
