|
|
 |
RE: [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
-
To: 'Roger Jørgensen' roger@localhost
-
From: Jørgen Hovland jorgen@localhost
-
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 15:11:02 +0200
-
Cc: "'Stephen Sprunk'" stephen@localhost, "'ARIN PPML'" ppml@localhost, address-policy-wg@localhost
-----Original Message-----
From: address-policy-wg-admin@localhost [ ] On Behalf Of Roger Jørgensen
> 1.) get ula-central and know for sure we won´t get into this issue ever again.
>
>2.) administrate our own local version of ULA-central for the organization we co-operate with
>
>3.) get RIR-space with all the add on administration and documentation...
> For me, only option 1.) is a real option, the other two are just
> work-around since we don´t need global routing of the address space in
> question.
The RIRs already provide globally unique address space. This is what you want. Both ULA-C and the RIRs do not guarantee global routability anyway.
ULA-L is never globally unique, so basically there is no such thing as "Unique Locally Assigned" addresses.
Q: Is it correct that you can get a /26 IPv4 PA block, but you can't get a /96 IPv6 PA block? Why is that?
Cheers,
J
|
|
|
|
