About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)

  • To: Mohacsi Janos mohacsi@localhost
  • From: Son Tran son@localhost
  • Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 23:40:36 +1000
  • Cc: "Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" Woeber@localhost, Sascha Lenz slz@localhost, address-policy-wg@localhost

Hi Mohacsi

Here is the statistic for PI (assignment) vs PA (allocation) for APNIC region. If you need more information please let us know.

Year     Number of PI     Number of PA

2000     23         354
2001     36         337
2002     44         282
2003     62         368
2004     68         478
2005     118        576
2006     103        727
2007     49         244

We don't have the PI policy until 2000.

Regards

Son

Mohacsi Janos wrote:



On Wed, 23 May 2007, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:

Sascha,

Sascha Lenz wrote:

[...]

P.S.: Anyone got any recent numbers about the percentage of PI
announcements in the table vs. PA announcements + deaggregates?

that's probably not the fully adequate answer, but I considered the
info in the following two slides (page 9 and 10) as very interesting
in this context:

http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-54/presentations/RIPE_NCC_Statistics.pdf

The bottom line is that the # of PI assignments has (considerably)
surpassed the number of PA assignments since 2003, and that the load on the routing table for PI is thus bigger than for PA, although the *percentage* of
PI space as compared to PA is approx. 2%.

Or, the other way 'round, we use more than 50% of (additional) routing table slots for some 2% of address space (PI) and less than 50% for some 98% of PA.

Are there similar statistics in the other RIR area? If the picture is similar we have in RIPE region, then we have think over PI address policy....

Only my 2 cents....

Janos Mohacsi
Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and Projects
NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F  4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882


--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Son Tran                              email:           son@localhost
Policy Development Manager, APNIC     sip:        son@localhost
http://www.apnic.net                  phone:         +61 7 3858 3100
                                      fax:           +61 7 3858 3199

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community