Re: Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
-
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum iljitsch@localhost
-
From: Masataka Ohta mohta@localhost
-
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 23:27:29 +0900
-
Cc: Sascha Lenz slz@localhost, address-policy-wg@localhost
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
Apparently, CIDR taught you nothing.
> The IETF spent 5 years getting scalable multihoming off the ground.
> Then the operator community / RIR policy makers decided shim6 wasn't
> good enough before it was even finished and we need PI in IPv6 for
> multihoming just like in IPv4.
In general, spending 5 years on such a simple problem is the
worst thing to do and, naturally, results in useless output.
Actually, shim6, from the beginning, is wrongly architechted.
It is not only useless but also harmful.
Fortunately, as IPv6 is not deployed at all, we still have some
time to start over again throwing away all the details of IPv6.
Masataka Ohta
|