|
|
 |
RE: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
-
From: Jørgen Hovland jorgen@localhost
-
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:00:52 +0200
Why does this proposal say it's for DNS only? I guess other anycast protocols aren't important enough?
j
-----Original Message-----
From: address-policy-wg-admin@localhost [ ] On Behalf Of Gert Doering
Sent: 25. april 2007 16:52
To: Nick Hilliard
Cc: Gert Doering; address-policy-wg@localhost
Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 03:44:26PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> >Well, yes-and-no. 2007-01 is only IPv6, while [...]
> 2007-01 applies to ipv4, ipv6 and as numbers.
Sorry. I got all confused with the IPv6 PI proposal (which is 200*6*-01).
However, my primary comment still stands :-) - if we end up having IPv6 PI,
we can do away with most of the special-case IPv6 policies.
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 113403
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
|
|
|
|
