Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-02 Discussion Period extended until 16 April 2007 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)

[Sascha Lenz slz@localhost]

Hi,

Shane Kerr schrieb:
[...]
> It seems a good idea to make IPv6 space easier to get.
right.

> Not really related to this specific proposed change, but maybe it is
> time to start thinking about making IPv4 space harder to get, too.
<?> IMHO wrong.
The only real selling point for IPv6 is "there is no IPv4 anymore".
So my p.o.v. is - waste IPv4, as fast as possible. Probably even make it 
easier to get.
What's the whole point in delaying the End-Of-IPv4 much further (it's 
not even crititcal at the moment btw, still enough there for years to 
come) if there is real&working IPv6 out there nowerdays?
And anyways, makes no sense - this will only make work harder for LIRs 
and Hostmaster, hence more expensive, and probably even worsen all the 
NAT idiocy out there - or just increase the amount of lies to RIPE NCC.
...my 0.02EUR, not considering possible problems lack of "fresh" IPv4 
space will cause ("you can have my /24 for 500000 bucks on ebay!!!"), 
but that's a general problem regardless of WHEN it runs out.
--
========================================================================
= Sascha Lenz                  SLZ-RIPE          slz@localhost         =
= Network Operations                                                   =
= BayCIX GmbH, Landshut                  * PGP public Key on demand *  =
========================================================================