Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)
-
From: Fernando García fgarcia@localhost
-
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:42:52 +0100
Well
I support the proposal
El 14/02/2007, a las 18:41, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet escribió:
- "...when routing is a major issue for the End User"
there is no definition of "major issue" and there is no indication
regarding which entity has to qualify or check this statement.
My understand of "major issue" is "when the end user is going to use
it for routing to/from Internet"
In effect this will open a path to a minimum /24 assignment per site,
and PI instead of PA.
Not a bad idea. If a end user wants multihoming, he will get it
(becoming a LIR itself, getting a slice of a PA and announcing it
independently,etc.: money talks and RIR listen) and probably (I think
so) this is the least dangerous way to do it. It will increase the
routing table size like any other but at least this will help to
preserve some address space.
- when the ISPs decide to NOT route some small address blocks then
trying to circumvent their configuration and intent by messing around
with address assignment policies is royally broken. If this is really
an operational problem then it needs a resolution on the routing
plane.
I dont see it as an operational problem. I see it as a business
problem. Companies want/need multihoming and will get it one way of
another. We can set up things to do it in the least dangerous way or
try to oppose it and see how things get worse.
- on a more general note, as long as the minimum assignemt size for
customers
receiving PA is raised to /24, too, this proposal is a real
incentive to go
for PI instead of PA.
I agree with that. I don't see a real reason to assign lower than /24
to any customer (and assigning less than /24 is a nightmare for
reverse DNS).
My two cents.
------------------------------------------------
Tecnocom
Fernando Garcia
Eurocomercial - Depto Técnico
Josefa Valcárcel 26, Edificio Merrimack III
Madrid 28027
Tel: +34 91 4359687
Fax: +34 91 4313240
e-mail: fgarcia@localhost
http://www.tecnocom.biz http://www.eurocomercial.es
|