About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)

  • From: Fernando García fgarcia@localhost
  • Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:42:52 +0100

Well

I support the proposal

El 14/02/2007, a las 18:41, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet escribió:

- "...when routing is a major issue for the End User"

there is no definition of "major issue" and there is no indication
regarding which entity has to qualify or check this statement.

My understand of "major issue" is "when the end user is going to use it for routing to/from Internet"

In effect this will open a path to a minimum /24 assignment per site,
and PI instead of PA.

Not a bad idea. If a end user wants multihoming, he will get it (becoming a LIR itself, getting a slice of a PA and announcing it independently,etc.: money talks and RIR listen) and probably (I think so) this is the least dangerous way to do it. It will increase the routing table size like any other but at least this will help to preserve some address space.

- when the ISPs decide to NOT route some small address blocks then
trying to circumvent their configuration and intent by messing around
with address assignment policies is royally broken. If this is really
an operational problem then it needs a resolution on the routing plane.

I dont see it as an operational problem. I see it as a business problem. Companies want/need multihoming and will get it one way of another. We can set up things to do it in the least dangerous way or try to oppose it and see how things get worse.

- on a more general note, as long as the minimum assignemt size for customers receiving PA is raised to /24, too, this proposal is a real incentive to go
for PI instead of PA.

I agree with that. I don't see a real reason to assign lower than /24 to any customer (and assigning less than /24 is a nightmare for reverse DNS).

My two cents.


------------------------------------------------
Tecnocom
Fernando Garcia
Eurocomercial - Depto Técnico

Josefa Valcárcel 26, Edificio Merrimack III
Madrid 28027

Tel: +34 91 4359687
Fax: +34 91 4313240
e-mail: fgarcia@localhost
http://www.tecnocom.biz http://www.eurocomercial.es





 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community