About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)

  • To: Gert Doering gert@localhost
  • From: Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda@localhost
  • Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 12:12:07 +0100

Hi Gert,

On Dec 19, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Gert Doering wrote:

[...]

I like this more than the previous one, but still some questions remain:

 - what about the AW for existing LIRs?  Will it be auto-raised to /21
   as well?

I think this would be part of the implementation. If the LIR had an IPv4 allocation for at least six months and their AW was under /21 then their AW would be raised to /21 - unless it has been reduced by the RIPE NCC because of misuse.

- what about the AW size *after* the initial raise? Can it be reduced to less than a /21 - and if yes, under which conditions, and at what
   time will it grow back?

Ah, perhaps I should have made it more clear in the updated text. This proposal does not change the current policy text, which states:

"The AW may also be lowered after or during an audit if invalid assignments are noted."

Regards,

--
Leo Vegoda
IANA Numbers Liaison




 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community