Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)

[Dennis Lundström dennis@localhost]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sounds reasonable. Although It's possible to adapt to the rules and  
regulations without attending the course.
It's a damn good idea to be there. If not for the sake, of meeting  
representatives from other ISP:s, and sharing ideas.
And offcourse getting answers for our everyday woes and worries  
directly from the RIPE-NCC.
I strongly recommend everyone who has not yet attended to give it a  
good thought.
Best regards.

- --Dennis Lundström
  GippNET AB



On Dec 14, 2006, at 17:44 , Andy Davidson wrote:

> On 13 Dec 2006, at 16:16, Leo Vegoda wrote:
>
> > Several people raised concerns that new LIRs may not have  
> > sufficient experience to make good decisions with a /21 AW.
> To appease those worriers, the policy could say that the AW growth  
> from 0 to /21 is only permitted if the LIR has at least one admin-c  
> who has been to RIPE LIR training ?
> Cheers
> Andy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFgmrmsqJZaeZjsn8RAiUoAKCNs5Bt+XXXfRQ0z5y8ehGC0AVzdQCglkNt
kZXrSr3ipHvAcen5Ab8N8zo=
=5KEv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----