|
|
 |
Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
-
To: "Andy Davidson" andy@localhost
-
From: "cja@localhost" packetgrrl@localhost
-
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:50:04 -0700
-
Cc: "Sascha Lenz" slz@localhost, address-policy-wg@localhost
-
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=qW3yvrcBH0UFDDbwazO7q0z9+WXrfqTgJ19MDvZoGeoYrnYZU7q89NjLA9OXe8darHKg5G51vYHNG1JtKv9YPUz+JJf5Xe3bDxT2vBBXsEbxsxs24Vux7TX0MBnBW9kNahLf/ELbLfa0mDDkiHvLEkwhBZUQaaVTSX9kjXwahsk=
-
Reply-to: cja@localhost
On 12/14/06, Andy Davidson <> wrote:
Just an incentive to encourage people to at least learn how to assign
'properly'.
Why can't the incentive be that the LIR won't be able to get more address space? That seems to work well in other regions.
---Cathy
|
|
|
|
