Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)

[Juergen Kammer <j.kammer@localhost]

On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:33:13AM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> [..]
> Could I suggest an alternative based on experience in dealing with new
> LIRs on the ground?  Many new LIRs are smaller operations with
> relatively small address space usage, and simply wouldn't get to send in
> a huge number of assignment requests within the first 6 months.  Because
> of this, they're just not going to get the hang of RIPE's address space
> administrative requirements.  Would it not therefore be more sensible to
> automatically increase the AW after either a set number of well-formed
> assignment requests were sent into RIPE?
> 
> Nick

Having sent in a set number of well-formed assignment requests sounds
a lot more logical as condition for getting the AW raised than
"having been an lir for 6 months" does.
This ensures that small LIRs really get enough contact and - on the
other hand - that big lirs will get their AW increased after only a
short time.
And all new LIRs have the same contact experiences with RIPE NCC when
they get their AW raised - which is what we are aiming for, I'd guess.

	Juergen.

-- 
Juergen Kammer	                   {Net,Dns,Host}master eurodata
eurodata GmbH & Co. KG             Tel. +49 681 8808761  Fax: +49 681 8808780
Grossblittersdorfer Str. 257-259   Email: j.kammer@localhost
D-66119 Saarbruecken               S/MIME certs: http://pki.eurodata.de