Re: [address-policy-wg] Allocation vs assignment question
-
To: "Gert Doering" gert@localhost
-
From: "Makc The Great" <makc.the.great@localhost
-
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 13:09:19 +0200
-
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SyYjWDtHWdWRMcqyrm0zeAxKKvv1D5xUmd7jJ3APNf7NAwNpySACEypUJ0PofqG5GoZU2gnvOjpN/1hOKiEteLc4qUlVgqGooMX6awOQeBH03YaoBJ7BCIoJcqNOoBoAR4NZtPfb5bEWatr857KbsIx8wDQsVyRfRV3/5KABzJ4=
On 12/4/06, Gert Doering gert@localhost wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 10:08:00AM +0200, Makc The Great wrote:
> My question is am I correct in assuming that all "assigned" IPs are on
> same physical network that all other IPs in their "sub-allocation"
> range?
Definitely not.
So, if you have IP range A.B.C.* allocated to you, and assigns A.B.C.D
to someone else, A.B.C.D may be plugged in any switch on the internet,
not necessary yours?
|
you are here: RIPE -> RIPE Maillists > Archives
