[address-policy-wg] RE: [address-policy-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 - Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window
-
To: "'Sascha Lenz'" slz@localhost, "'leo vegoda'" leo@localhost
-
From: "Sander Steffann" <s.steffann@localhost
-
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 16:06:01 +0100
-
Cc: "'Address Policy WG'" address-policy-wg@localhost
-
Organization: Computel | Nederland.net
Hi,
> I only mentioned some concern about no slow-start mechanism
> at all, but basically a per-LIR AW doesn't make much sense
> anyways. Usuallly "older", "bigger" LIRs have quite some
> "high" AW already, even if they have a high fluctuation
> of LIR-contacts/hostmasters, too (students ect.)
> So, personally, the current AW doesn't tell that much about
> quality of Assignments made anyways - it's quite obsolete
> from this p.o.v.
That is true. In assignment window for new LIR's would make some sense, just
to make sure that they don't do anything silly because of a
misunderstanding. There is a big chance that nobody in the organisation has
experience in running an LIR. They might even still be thinking in
classes... (in my experience a lot of people don't read documents until they
have to, so they might have ignored CIDR until now) Letting them start (for
a short time) with an AW of /25 will probably make them aware :)
Just some thoughts..
Sander
|