Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-04 New Draft Document Published (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
-
To: "Hank Nussbacher" hank@localhost
-
From: McTim dogwallah@localhost
-
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:40:36 +0300
-
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PezcFu7Se01tfetgDlKopgCSRLDm1JKifR48TNDTpsnpjZoFvQLRtRVDWv3vmGMd+8emHoUDNF73Kf/7zf27UsaSERUp7T/slSGJOCvswU8+bpfA8xygEwc9PRqewl2Xyz0jOLb9oak8HsaY7dDuneL/P8NAnTdAb4rcA+rIwPY=
Hank,
On 10/31/06, Hank Nussbacher hank@localhost wrote:
>The real issue here is that current RIPE policies
>allow RIPE members to wash their hands of all
>network operational issues associated with the
>addresses which they have assigned to other
>organizations.
Allow me to disagree.
Allow me to agree with you ;-), and support the policy as written.
--
Cheers,
McTim
$ whois -h whois.afrinic.net mctim
|
you are here: RIPE -> RIPE Maillists > Archives
