|
|
 |
Re: [address-policy-wg] Comment on 2006-05 (PI Assignment Size)
-
From: "Sander Steffann" <s.steffann@localhost
-
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:16:04 +0200
-
Organization: Computel Standby BV
Hi,
I support the 2006-05 proposal. We have one client who insisted
on getting PI space, but they qualified for at most /27. Then we
had to actually request that /27 and have them expierience what
prefix filtering does to small PI networks.
I'm a bit afraid of mixing RIPE address policy interests/requirements and
routing policy interests/requirements. Ofcourse a lot of address space is
requested to be routed, so there is a connection between the two.
I'm just afraid that common routing policies will change if we change the
address policy, so then we'll have to change the address policy again, which
will lead to changes in common routing policy, etc..
We have to be careful here.
Sander
|
|
|
|
