RE: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy (2006-02)

[<matthew.ford@localhost]

That's good news, and saves me typing up my unhappiness with the 2006-01
text as well :)

Mat 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address-policy-wg-admin@localhost 
> [
	    
	    
] On Behalf Of Gert Doering
> Sent: 25 October 2006 11:01
> To: Ford,M,Mat,CXR9 R
> Cc: llc@localhost address-policy-wg@localhost
> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Address Allocation and 
> Assignment Policy (2006-02)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:44:07AM +0100, matthew.ford@localhost wrote:
> > In the absence of a better alternative (which 2006-02 is 
> emphatically 
> > not), then the current policy must suffice.
> 
> From the "policy development process" view, this proposal is currently
> at the end of the "discussion phase".  No consensus was reached, so it
> can not go ahead.
> 
> As it was pretty clear that there is a desire to get rid of 
> the 200-customer
> rule, but that this specific wording isn't going to be *the* answer, 
> Jordi Palet is now working on an updated proposal, which should bring
> us further forward.
> 
> The new proposal (actually, two new proposals, one for 
> 2006-01 and one for
> 2006-02) will be circulated "in a few days".
> 
> Gert Doering
>         -- RIPE AP WG Chair
> -- 
> Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  98999
> 
> SpaceNet AG                    Mail: netmaster@localhost
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14      Tel : +49-89-32356-0
> D- 80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-234
> 
>