Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy (2006-02)

[Gert Doering gert@localhost]

Hi,

On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:44:07AM +0100, matthew.ford@localhost wrote:
> In the absence of a better alternative (which 2006-02 is emphatically 
> not), then the current policy must suffice.

From the "policy development process" view, this proposal is currently
at the end of the "discussion phase".  No consensus was reached, so it
can not go ahead.

As it was pretty clear that there is a desire to get rid of the 200-customer
rule, but that this specific wording isn't going to be *the* answer, 
Jordi Palet is now working on an updated proposal, which should bring
us further forward.

The new proposal (actually, two new proposals, one for 2006-01 and one for
2006-02) will be circulated "in a few days".

Gert Doering
        -- RIPE AP WG Chair
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  98999

SpaceNet AG                    Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14      Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-234