RE: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy (2006-02)

["Stefan Camilleri" <stefan.camilleri@localhost]

Hi,

I think that the modifications as proposed, though still not *there* are a big
improvement on existing text particularly with the dropping of the requirement
for 200 /48 assignments.

I fully support the new Proposal 

Regards.

Stephen
SC4079-RIPE

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address-policy-wg-admin@localhost 
> [
	    
	    
] On Behalf Of JORDI 
> PALET MARTINEZ
> Sent: L-Erbgħa, 27 ta' Settembru 2006 12:02
> Subject: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Address Allocation and 
> Assignment Policy (2006-02)
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Same for this one ... Looking for further inputs to this 
> policy proposal.
> 
> As the discussion period for this proposal
> (http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-02.html) is 
> almost over, I will like to ask for the latest inputs in 
> order to further decide how to proceed.
> 
> Filiz arranged some stats about the discussion (thanks a lot 
> for that !) last July, and afterwards, even if the discussion 
> period has been extended, I don't recall having seen new comments.
> 
> The stats don't include my own postings:
> 
> >>> - there were 39 posts from 14 different individuals about it.
> >>> 
> >>> - 8 people supported it.
> >>> 
> >>> - 1 person *seemed* to be in favour of keeping the current policy.
> >>> 
> >>> - 5 people made comments which I could not identify a 
> clear support 
> >>> or objection.
> 
> So someone else will like to say anything new or clarify 
> their view in favor or opposition to the proposal ?
> 
> Regards,
> Jordi
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **********************************************
> The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org
> 
> Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
> http://www.ipv6day.org
> 
> This electronic message contains information which may be 
> privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be 
> for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not 
> the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, 
> distribution or use of the contents of this information, 
> including attached files, is prohibited.
> 
> 
> 
>