About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 New Policy Proposal (Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window)

  • To: Sascha Lenz slz@localhost
  • From: "Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" Woeber@localhost
  • Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 15:35:09 +0000
  • Cc: Gert Doering gert@localhost, address-policy-wg@localhost, Leo Vegoda leo@localhost, Hans Petter Holen hph@localhost
  • Organization: UniVie - ACOnet
  • Reply-to: Woeber@localhost

Sascha Lenz wrote:

[...]
> For (standard) IPv6 assignments, you don't even have to ask RIPE in most
> cases by default.
[...]

Which makes me remember again that I added the following comment to similar
discussions in the past:

"I don't believe that the /`whatever` is a useful yardstick to reasonably
measure the complexity, difficulty or quality of request assessment for
an assignment."

My only problem is that I don't know which conclusion to draw from this,
regarding the AW...

Wilfried.




 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community