Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 New Policy Proposal (Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window)
-
To: Fernando García fgarcia@localhost, Filiz Yilmaz filiz@localhost, Leo Vegoda leo@localhost, Hans Petter Holen hph@localhost
-
From: Gert Doering gert@localhost
-
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 10:29:40 +0200
-
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
-
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=tON1ER0oluKR7juMt4J9sQYlzc1xY20g993YcN+jZhShvKNU5vjx15C5szUZHXpN ;
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 10:25:50AM +0200, Fernando García wrote:
> I would modify your propossal to:
> 1st AW or /24
> Raised AW to /22 after the first or second allocation is made if
> there are no errors in those.
Well, that's the way it is now - if you send a few requests to the
NCC hostmasters, and they are approved, you're granted an AW of the
size of these requests (roughly so).
So we wouldn't actually need the second sentence, it would account
to "minimum AW of a /24"... - which I could live with, but Leo is
clearly aiming for "more".
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 98999
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
|
you are here: RIPE -> RIPE Maillists > Archives
