Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy (2006-02)
-
To: "address-policy-wg@localhost" address-policy-wg@localhost
-
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@localhost
-
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:52:54 +0200
-
Reply-to: jordi.palet@localhost
Hi Roger,
Not sure if you mean if I convinced in private to some people. If that was
your idea, believe me, it has not been the case, I really prefer very open
debate. I hate doing so, and actually if anyone contacted me in private, I
always suggested to do it in the list (and there was one specific case only,
who already went to the list).
Even if it will not be "illegal" to try to convince people, as said, I'm not
a fan at all of that, and actually seems to me more productive to raise all
the pros and cons in the list. That's why we have a list, right ?
And by the way, it has been my fault in the last months not having achieved
more discussion on this, because I was too busy, so hopefully this is going
to help before the end of the discussion period :-).
Regards,
Jordi
> De: Roger Jorgensen rogerj@localhost
> Responder a: address-policy-wg-admin@localhost
> Fecha: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:16:04 +0200 (CEST)
> Para: Marc van Selm <marc.van.selm@localhost
> CC: "address-policy-wg@localhost" address-policy-wg@localhost
> Asunto: Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy
> (2006-02)
>
> It's now almost at the point where I start to wonder if Jordi have been
> arranging for people to send in their support.
>
>
>
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Marc van Selm wrote:
>> On Wednesday 27 September 2006 12:01, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Same for this one ... Looking for further inputs to this policy proposal.
> <snip>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------
> Roger Jorgensen |
> roger@localhost | - IPv6 is The Key!
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org
Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
http://www.ipv6day.org
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
|