Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
-
From: Max Tulyev president@localhost
-
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:27:06 +0000
Andy Davidson wrote:
> You're opening up a huge can of worms here.
> 'Getting back IPs' means
> contacting peers and upstreams and telling these parties to stop
> accepting the announcement from the non-paying company. If the company
> is still paying bills to their upstreams, do you think upstreams will
> take kindly to this action ?
> The RIPE NCC deleting the inetnum object doesn't mean the addresses stop
> routing ...
It means. Just because of this space will not be routed in the world.
RR DB is a good thing! ;)
--
WBR,
Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253@localhost)
|
