Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)

[Gennady Abramov abramov@localhost]

On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 02:54:09PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> > And, don't forget that you even can do multihoming without PI address
> > space, by multihoming of PA assigment (if LIR permitted it).
> 
> It's nothing to do with your LIR.  You can only do this if your
> secondary upstream agrees to it.  Your LIR can shout and jump up and
> down and tell you not to do this, but they can't stop their competitor
> from leaking a prefix which they really shouldn't.
Mm... In most cases, LIR protects (Or at least, should protect, I think) PA assigments by his own mntner.
Secondary upstream can't create route object on this specific PA
assigment from first LIR without agreement, and this prefix wouldn't be routed in Internet normally.
> 
> Fortunately, most ISPs won't do this sort of thing.
> 
> Nick

--
Regards,                                                                        
Gennady Abramov, CCNP, AGV77-RIPE                                               
Demos-Internet NOC                                                              
Phone: +7 (495) 737-0436                                                        
http://www.demos.ru/address