Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
To: Max Tulyev president@localhost
From: Andy Davidson andy@localhost
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 02:00:20 +0100
Max Tulyev wrote:
This story is about PA/LIR, where (again, in the theory) all is quite
simply. No money -> closing contarct (as in terms of it) -> getting back
IPs.
You're opening up a huge can of worms here. 'Getting back IPs' means
contacting peers and upstreams and telling these parties to stop
accepting the announcement from the non-paying company. If the company
is still paying bills to their upstreams, do you think upstreams will
take kindly to this action ?
The RIPE NCC deleting the inetnum object doesn't mean the addresses stop
routing ...
RIPE NCC possibly have no contract with the companies that would need to
stop accepting the prefixes from the debting party.
