Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)

[Max Tulyev president@localhost]

David Conrad wrote:
>> You also can't scale PA when it
>> ends. You only can allocate new one.
> 
> The difference, of course, is that PA (by definition) can be aggregated
> into a single announcement, thereby reducing the amount of information
> sloshing around the routing system.  It is true that if an ISP runs out
> of PA prefixes to assign to their customers that they'll need to get
> another one and that additional prefix will need to be PI, but that is a
> single prefix that aggregates all the customers numbered out of that
> prefix.  This is Routing Scalability 101.

Please, see the difference of just customers (who don't know anything
about PI vs PA at all, using their ADSL connection and be happy) and
those who need own routing policy and own IP space. You can't aggregate
second one into single prefix by definition.

Again, I don't even think about "portable IPs to any customer" at this
stage of Internet evolution. May be a bit later? But not now.

-- 
WBR,
Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253@localhost)