About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)

  • To: Andy Davidson andy@localhost
  • From: Gert Doering gert@localhost
  • Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:52:51 +0200
  • Cc: Gert Doering gert@localhost, address-policy-wg@localhost
  • Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=W2aoXxNhvTOwmpBJ1qlNa2N/oIeDwyXx1JEW2mTgXlWacFInozumIUubGwLrknUl ;

Hi,

On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 06:47:48PM +0100, Andy Davidson wrote:
> If we accept argument that we should, as a community, advocate no  
> smaller PI assignments smaller than a /24 because of table  
> filtration, what happens when the table grows to the size that  
> operators start to filter on longer masks ?

In that case, PI receipients holding a /24 suddenly are without
connectivity to these networks - and will start yelling at RIPE.

Which is basically the point while RIPE (and the RIPE NCC) has previously
always refused to make any statements regarding the routeability of
a given network size.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  94488

SpaceNet AG                    Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14      Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-234




 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community