About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)

  • From: Erich Hohermuth eh@localhost
  • Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:02:27 +0200
  • Organization: SolNet ISP

Hi

> >    http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-05.html
> >
> > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
> > address-policy-wg@localhost before 26 September 2006.

The proposal make sense but we have to look deeper into the problem of
increase the prefixes. If someone ask for multihoming with PI Space, it
makes sense that we assign a size which will work with the current
filtering policies. But maybe we have to change the policy about PI
Space in general ? The question is, which "problems" do we rate as a
higher risk; waste of ip space, amount of prefixes, reach ability of a
subnet. What do you think ?

Regards
	Erich
-- 
* Erich Hohermuth IP Engineer - SolNet (AS 9044) PGPKEY-46A08FCB *
   * phone: +41 32 686 8220 / sip:9044*463@localhost *




 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community