Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)

[Mikael Abrahamsson swmike@localhost]

On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Filiz Yilmaz wrote:

> This proposal suggests to have the minimum assignment size for PI
> assignments to be a /24 when routing is a major issue for a
> multihoming End User.
>
>    http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-05.html
>
> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
> address-policy-wg@localhost before 26 September 2006.
Hello. This proposal is proposing the same things I was arguing in my 
email, so I second this.
I have a question though, the proposal includes the notion of "major 
issue", perhaps this could be specified a bit more? Or is it clear how 
this would be interpreted by a hostmaster processing an application, that 
if the customer adds "I need to advertise this on the public internet" it 
will automatically be known that a at least a /24 is needed?
--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@localhost