[address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-04 New Policy Proposal (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)

[Michele Neylon michele@localhost]

Jeff Scribner wrote:
> Michele,
>  
> The original proposal provided for enforcement.  That part was removed
> because it crosses into another area of responsibility.  However, if the
> proposal is adopted and then violated, another proposal could be made
> providing for enforcement.  At least that is my understanding of the
> situation. 
>  
> You might note that I made this proposal because our security department
> was running into e-mail addresses that didn't work, were missing or
> directed one to a web site.  All of these results dramatically increase
> the time required to report abuse of an IP address.  If the proposal is
> adopted, I think there will be a lot of people and organizations
> interested in enforcement.
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Jeff

Jeff
that sounds reasonable.

We've had a similar experience when trying to report abuse. Although I
am subbed to this list from my personal address I am also one of the
abuse contacts for a RIPE LIR :)

A lack of response to an abuse report doesn't bother me, but bounces and
web redirects are incredibly frustrating, especially when the web form
is incomprehensible

Thanks for the extra info

Regards

Michele


-- 
http://www.mneylon.com/blog
http://www.irishwebmasterforum.com/
http://www.armchair.ie/