Re: [address-policy-wg] Proposal for change to the IPv4 PI allocation policy
-
To: Max Tulyev president@localhost
-
From: Gert Doering gert@localhost
-
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:28:19 +0200
-
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
-
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=enXZqZWEi7OhSfa9dwd+KZa7Q3Z/gdRTG4es4kUbzep6fkVqQ/HBoUKV8tUybLgM ;
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:16:49PM +0000, Max Tulyev wrote:
> > PI *is* worse to debug if some targets can't be reached (if only because
> > you normally can't run traceroutes from inside customer PI networks).
>
> But what exactly (versus PA) is worse? Same ping and traceroute, same
> bgp debug, so on.
With PA, you can debug from *your* network - with customer's PI, you
can't (normally) run probes (traceroute, ping) from *their* IP addresses
- and if your PA works, but their PI is filtered, this makes it harder
to debug.
Furthermore, /24s tend to be damped more quickly and for longer times
than /16...
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 94488
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
|