About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [address-policy-wg] Proposal for change to the IPv4 PI allocation policy

  • To: Max Tulyev president@localhost
  • From: Gert Doering gert@localhost
  • Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:28:19 +0200
  • Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=enXZqZWEi7OhSfa9dwd+KZa7Q3Z/gdRTG4es4kUbzep6fkVqQ/HBoUKV8tUybLgM ;

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:16:49PM +0000, Max Tulyev wrote:
> > PI *is* worse to debug if some targets can't be reached (if only because
> > you normally can't run traceroutes from inside customer PI networks).
> 
> But what exactly (versus PA) is worse? Same ping and traceroute, same
> bgp debug, so on.

With PA, you can debug from *your* network - with customer's PI, you
can't (normally) run probes (traceroute, ping) from *their* IP addresses
- and if your PA works, but their PI is filtered, this makes it harder
to debug.

Furthermore, /24s tend to be damped more quickly and for longer times
than /16...

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  94488

SpaceNet AG                    Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14      Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-234




 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community