Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)

[Iljitsch van Beijnum iljitsch@localhost]

On 8-jun-2006, at 12:31, Stefan Camilleri wrote:

> > Note it says "a plan".  An organization incapable of coming up  
> > with _a plan_ to allocate 200 /48s has more
> > significant problems than not having IPv6 space.
[...]

> We have over /17 of IPv4 address space allocated. We have over  
> 20,000 broadband customers and well over 200 clients that would  
> benefit from Ipv6 assignments and who now either have a /24 to /28  
> or use NAT. We also operate a small transit network and are linked  
> to a major European Tier1 provider. Finally we are part of an Ipv6  
> task force trying to determine the future direction of IPv6  
> rollout. But basically I CANNOT have a plan, at this stage for /48  
> on Ipv6. Its WAY too early.
You must have SOME kind of plan if you want to get an IPv6 block in  
your hands now... This is what I wrote for a customer for their IPv6  
request, which was granted without further questions within days:
#[REQUIRED INFORMATION]#

confirmation: we'll conform to the policy.

#[INSERT SUPPLEMENTAL COMMENTS]#

We currently have several customers who have asked for IPv6
service. We expect to give out several /48s to colo customers
immediately, around 15 within a year and 50 or so within
two years. We currently don't have IPv6 capability for our
DSL and dial-up infrastructure, but expect to add IPv6 here
and start giving out /48s to customers later this year, after
we've installed a new router at [...]. We'll then be
rolling out IPv6 first to existing customers (25 after a year)
but we also expect that we can interest new customers in more
advanced capabilities such as IPv6, multicast and IPv6
multicast, reaching the required 200 /48s in the second year.

> And one final thing, we're talking about IPv6. The addressing space  
> that can allow 2000 addresses per square meter on the planet as  
> some of the current cliches go... We're established and qualified  
> in the business but I have to beg, grovel or lie to get  this  
> allocation!! THAT is confusing
Getting the addresses is not the issue, occupying a slot at the top  
of the routing hierarchy is. This means you take up an entry in the  
FIB tables of all IPv6 DFZ routers world wide, which then all have to  
provide electricity to determine whether the packets flowing through  
them match your prefix.