Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal
-
From: Fernando García fgarcia@localhost
-
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:31:25 +0300
I support Thor-Henrik views and opinions.
Regards, Fernando
El 27/04/2006, a las 10:48, Thor-Henrik Kvandahl escribió:
Hi all,
here are my *personal* opinion on this proposal.
I do not support this proposal, and my reasons for this are:
* This proposal increases the rate of consumption of IPv4.
* It favourises the large ISPs.
* In the presentation on RIPE 52, Tuesday by Filiz Yilmaz, we where
told
that this proposal was abandoned by ARIN and APNIC, and one
representative from LacNIC also stood up and expressed their
conserns.
I have not heard anything from AfriNIC, but I cannot see why they
would
want to implement this policy. I feel if will be arrogant of the
RIPE
community to disregard the other RIRs conserns and implement this
policy.
And I also have to agree with Gert Doering who said in the address
policy
WG that there has been very quiet around this proposal, and that the
reason for this can be that ETNO claims thay "unanimously support this
proposal".
--
Thor-Henrik Kvandahl
no.telenor
------------------------------------------------
Fernando Garcia |Tel: +34 91 4359687
EUROCOMERCIAL I&C SA |Fax: +34 91 4313240
Valentín Beato, 5 |e-mail: fgarcia@localhost
E-28037 Madrid |
Spain |http://www.eurocomercial.es
|