|
|
 |
RE: [address-policy-wg] Renumbering sites (Was: Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive)
-
To: "'Nils Ketelsen'" nils@localhost, address-policy-wg@localhost
-
From: Jørgen Hovland jorgen@localhost
-
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 23:04:55 +0200
(apologise for being slightly OT)
-----Original Message-----
From: address-policy-wg-admin@localhost
[ ] On Behalf Of Nils Ketelsen
> You seem to have a very easy Job,
65% of my day goes to doing stuff a machine could have done.
20% goes to developing software/hardware so the machine can do it instead of
us.
The rest are coffee breaks and meetings.
> when you can make this proper policy for
> your customers.
Some demand it, a few don't, but they all ask.
> I can not, those (about) 100 connecting to my network all
> have different policies, different needs, different requirements. And we
do
> our best, to fullfill their needs and make it as easy for them as
possible.
I didn't mention it would be in violation to your customers existing
policies/needs. You automatically assumed so without even thinking/knowing
how it can be implemented.
> We call that "service".
I surely would call that service, yes. Automatic renumbering service. I bet
at least 5 people stole my idea just now.
> If you do not have to provide this, good for you.
What, service?
> But please do not tell me, that my need to have paying customers is bad
> design.
If your intentions are to get _any_ potential customer, then you obviously
need to loosen up on policies as they all have special needs. In that case,
I understand you completely.
(I dropped a comment here on how not to get huge amount of customers when
you adjust policies on demand per customer case)
> Nils, not in the ISP-Business
j,
in the ISP-business (with friends)
|
|
|
|
