About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [address-policy-wg] Renumbering sites (Was: Just say *NO* to PI space --or how to make it lessdestructive)

  • From: Nils Ketelsen nils@localhost
  • Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:05:26 +0200

On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 07:41:19PM +0200, Roger Jorgensen wrote:

> really bad example, you never have a 1 or 2 weeks periode (planned time) 
> to renumber, you plan it over monthss to make sure things like you 
> describe don't happen. Good planing avoid alot of issues..

Thats the point. You need to invest many man-months to renumber. That is
what companies usually consider as being "expensive". Apart from the hassle
with customers, telling them about your yearly renumbering and forcing them
to do work again. 

> and for the rest of your mail, why can't we all stop thinking in terms of 
> IP addresses and start thinking in terms of hostnames?

Because IP-Packets are using IP-Addresses and not 
hostnames to get to their destination. 

Nils
-- 
This message will self-destruct after the default expiration-time.




 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community