Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6

[Jeroen Massar jeroen@localhost]

Marc van Selm wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2006 11:59, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> 
> [...]
>> The IT department or even special Networking department is effectively
>> the "ISP" for the organization. That they only service customers of
>> their mother company is not the question here: they service 200 customers.
> [...]
[..]
> Yes you are right and that's how I'd like to treat it for NATO.
> The definition of an organization and customer is sufficiently flexible.
> So if flexibility of definitions is acceptable (non of us wants to be a
> lawyer I presume) than we should (should?) close the thread and move on.

Thus indeed for you (NATO) the thread is closed.

The flexibility of the policy was put in place to allow various setups
to be meant for this policy. But there are apparently other
organizations who do not fulfill the current policies requirements but
do need address space. These folks *DO* need to come forward and raise
their voices and specify how they don't fit in the current policy and
how much address space they need.

Greets,
 Jeroen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature