Re: [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
-
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <>
-
From:
-
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 22:01:48 +0000
-
Cc: Per Heldal <>,
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 09:47:24PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 7-dec-2005, at 13:12, Per Heldal wrote:
>
> >>Geographical aggregation does not REQUIRE free transit.
>
> >[Does Fedex deliver goods to everybody in a region if only one
> >customer
> >in the region pays for their service?]
>
> That's not the right analogy. The right analogy is: does a Fedex
> truck driver in New York have a street map for Berlin? Answer: no.
> The NY Fedex driver knows that packages for Berlin should go to
> Europe. More specific routing information becomes available as the
> package gets closer to its destination.
>
> So Fedex does aggregate on geography, but only _internally_. Fedex as
> a whole still has all the detailed information for the entire world.
> (Well, the parts they serve at least.)
Interior Gateway Protocols... kind of like OSPFv3 for v6?
--bill
>
> Iljitsch
>
> --
> I've written another book! http://www.runningipv6.net/
>
|