About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] a consensus, about what?

  • To:
  • From: Gert Doering <
    >
  • Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 20:53:36 +0100
  • Cc:
    ,
    ,
  • Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=CUXP0+goRTBFaYdHoV8YerSqzceO/VHXAYpyl6Ai1UYhSmhXHgePgL4liuR22o95 ;

Hi,

On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 11:08:47AM -0500, peter.sherbin@localhost wrote:
> Get rid of the current hierarchy which requires ISP in order to
> connect to the network. The Internet is an aggregation of interconnected
> networks. We want to replicate what the Mother Nature has already
> given us, i.e. a brain like structure where neurons (individual
> networks) have multiple direct connections with each other. As brain
> cells networks should have about the same size. Network prefix
> determines the size.

Ah, back to the source-route-bridged times of (ring-) explorer packets... 

Sounds like a nice idea, would even be much more resilient than the
current structure.

Any IETF proposals where we can read up on how this is gonna work?

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  81421

SpaceNet AG                    Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14      Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-234



 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community