|
|
 |
Re: [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
-
To: Sascha Lenz <>
-
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <>
-
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:55:47 +0100
My apologies for replying to such an old message, but I couldn't let
this one go.
On 18-nov-2005, at 12:33, Sascha Lenz wrote:
In particular, noone came up with an equal solution to BGP Multihoming
with "PI"-space, which i hoped for back then.
Well, you haven't been paying attention, because I've presented
"provider-internal aggregation based on geography" at two different
RIPE meetings a while ago.
The only thing I got was perplexed stares.
You really can't expect to keep doing the same thing we've been doing
in IPv4 in IPv6 but now with different results (= more reasonable
routing tables).
Iljitsch
--
I've written another book! http://www.runningipv6.net/
|
|
|
|
