Re: [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

[Gert Doering <]

Hi,

On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 10:55:39AM +0000, Tim Chown wrote:
> a /48 for the broker and allocating /56 and /64 blocks.   Is this the
> way it's meant to be, or should the ISP owning the /32 only need to 
> report usage when asking for more space itself?

Well, it depends.  If you want to "ASSIGN" a /40 to the tunnel broker,
it falls into the category "assignment of networks larger than a /48
to the end user", and that's paperwork.

The way it was meant to be done is doing a sub-allocation (which never
goes to "end-users", unlike an assignment), and IPv6 sub-allocations, as
far as I understand the policy, don't need to be approved by the NCC
beforehand.

Of course, when you sub-allocate all of your space away, and the 
receipients don't use it, you won't be able to get more space for you
- so use with care.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  81421

SpaceNet AG                    Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14      Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-234