[address-policy-wg] Re: a consensus, about what?
-
To: Roger Jorgensen <>
-
From: Gert Doering <>
-
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 09:56:04 +0100
-
Cc: Gert Doering <>, ,
-
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
-
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=KZt1rC/1scLa4tSkuFN/ulJ3e1/fZz2PqVyp85ldacaPFYH/9XC6BIst3jf34UNc ;
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:43:56AM +0100, Roger Jorgensen wrote:
> so what sort of consensus are we aiming for, and about what? A new policy
> for AS, a net block, routing policy, multihoming, or just IPv6 in general?
> This entire discussion have been sidetracked alot, not a bad thing either,
> quite alot of topics have been discussed and interesting thoughts brought
> forward.. but what are our goal with all this?
The basic policy issue seems to me:
- who can get a (globally routeable [1]) IPv6 prefix
it might affect the policy "who can get an AS number".
The basic technical issue seems to be:
- is "IPv4-style" BGP multihoming the correct way to do in IPv6
[1] globally routeable in the sense of "the majority of the participants
in the global IPv6 routing system will be able to send packets that way".
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 81421
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
|