About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

[address-policy-wg] Re: a consensus, about what?

  • To: Roger Jorgensen <
    >
  • From: Gert Doering <
    >
  • Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 09:56:04 +0100
  • Cc: Gert Doering <
    >,
    ,
  • Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=KZt1rC/1scLa4tSkuFN/ulJ3e1/fZz2PqVyp85ldacaPFYH/9XC6BIst3jf34UNc ;

Hi,

On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:43:56AM +0100, Roger Jorgensen wrote:
> so what sort of consensus are we aiming for, and about what? A new policy 
> for AS, a net block, routing policy, multihoming, or just IPv6 in general? 
> This entire discussion have been sidetracked alot, not a bad thing either, 
> quite alot of topics have been discussed and interesting thoughts brought 
> forward.. but what are our goal with all this?

The basic policy issue seems to me:

  - who can get a (globally routeable [1]) IPv6 prefix

it might affect the policy "who can get an AS number".


The basic technical issue seems to be:

  - is "IPv4-style" BGP multihoming the correct way to do in IPv6


[1] globally routeable in the sense of "the majority of the participants
in the global IPv6 routing system will be able to send packets that way".


Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  81421

SpaceNet AG                    Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14      Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-234



 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community