RE: [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

["leo vegoda" <]

Hi Jeroen,

Jeroen Massar wrote:

> <SNIP>
> > I think each LIR should get a /32 and we should drop the 
> 200 "customer"
> > rule.  But that is just me...
> 
> A question which most likely only RIPE NCC can answer: has there ever
> been a LIR who requested an IPv6 allocation and got rejected?

We analysed the requests and questions we have received and presented
the details at RIPE 50.

http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-50/presentations/ripe50-ap-ipv6nu
mbers.pdf

mms://webcast.ripe.net/ripe-50/address-policy-1.wmv

http://www.ripe.net/ripe/wg/address-policy/r50-minutes.html
(section F)

Basically, ~2% of requests did not end in address space being
registered. We don't know how many requests are not sent in.

Regards,

-- 
leo vegoda
RIPE NCC
Registration Services Manager