Re: [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <]

On 30 nov 2005, at 17.16, Daniel Roesen wrote:

> ISPs do exist for customers, not customers do exist  to feed ISPs  
> in the
> most convenient way for the ISPs. Some folks seem to forget that,
> looking at all the discussion trying to ignore the demand for real
> multihoming (and that includes TE and network-wide routing policy
> implementation, neither being delivered by things like shim6).
I think you are contradicting yourself here. Shim6 does give the end- 
user TE capability. It does not give the ISP the possibility to  
ignore it, as they could today. I am not sure what you mean with  
"network-wide routing policy implementation"....

I have still to figure out what the "real multihoming" thing is, but  
I am sure it must be beautiful.

> HOW the requirements are being delivered is another topic. multi6 has
> resulted in the decision to ignore many critical requirements. We're
> just asking for something that delivers on the targets. Wasting time
> with half-solutions is not productive. Halting any development because
> the magic bullet wasn't found yet ain't either.
If you have alternative ideas you know how it works - send text.

- kurtis -