[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] closed network and need for global uniqe IP space
-
To: Roger Jorgensen <>
-
From: Gert Doering <>
-
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:18:46 +0100
-
Cc: , ,
-
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
-
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=ljIHJ+titKTEwo3VxtCkfvhnl68X/OmOrNUN2FJkU8aomVd6wIKSAME1xnCzy8Ux ;
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 10:12:35AM +0100, Roger Jorgensen wrote:
> The solutions aren't really that tricky but let me mention a few
> options...
> * Site local would have solved our problem BUT it's obsolite, quite
> stupid really.
That's why there are ULA ("unique local addresses") now. They should
fit your needs pretty well - as much addresses as you want, and the
guarantee to be not officially assigned to anyone.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 81421
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
|
you are here: RIPE -> RIPE Maillists > Archives
