About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6

  • To: Jeroen Massar <
    >,Andre Oppermann <
    >
  • From: Tim Streater <
    >
  • Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:21:53 +0000
  • Cc: Marc van Selm <
    >,

At 09:52 18/11/2005, Jeroen Massar wrote:

>If you are really too small, that is you have at most 10 sites, then you
>simply are too small.

Actually two sites at present. But I wouldn't call a network that will provide v6 transit for the NRENs of a dozen or so Mediterranean countries "small", in the sense of significance. As I said, I haven't looked at this issue for a while, but I do recall that the policy was:

1) Getting space required the 200 customer plan
2) No PI space for v6

If this is the stated policy, doesn't seem much point in making an enquiry. If I were able to get the space, (1), and (2) notwithstanding, what would be the point of the policy?

The present policy models a small portion of reality, and appears to leave major portions unprovided for, as others e-mails have attested. 

-- Tim



 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community