Re: [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
-
To: Jeroen Massar <>,Andre Oppermann <>
-
From: Tim Streater <>
-
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:21:53 +0000
-
Cc: Marc van Selm <>,
At 09:52 18/11/2005, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>If you are really too small, that is you have at most 10 sites, then you
>simply are too small.
Actually two sites at present. But I wouldn't call a network that will provide v6 transit for the NRENs of a dozen or so Mediterranean countries "small", in the sense of significance. As I said, I haven't looked at this issue for a while, but I do recall that the policy was:
1) Getting space required the 200 customer plan
2) No PI space for v6
If this is the stated policy, doesn't seem much point in making an enquiry. If I were able to get the space, (1), and (2) notwithstanding, what would be the point of the policy?
The present policy models a small portion of reality, and appears to leave major portions unprovided for, as others e-mails have attested.
-- Tim
|